JUDGE EXPERIENCE.
The AIDA system of judge development has a flaw.
It does not measure true experience. There are heavier and lighter points - differentiated in A, B, C, D, E - even though the judge does the same thing: judging a performance according to the same rules.
Why should raising the card in front of a world record be more rewarded than in front of any other performance judged by exactly the same rules? Same rules in WC as in a national competition.
Proposed change:
Measure experience in a unit called Experience points (EP).
A system that reflects TRUE experience.
AWARD EP ACCORDING TO NUMBER OF PERFORMANCES JUDGED.
Every time a judge lifts a card he/she gains experience.
Award EP for:
| - Pool competition |
1 P/ performance |
| - Depth competitions |
1.5 P/ performance
|
| - Judge assistant/mentoring (side by side with "cardjudge") |
0.5 P/ Performance |
| - Points per world record attempts (in individual record attempts) |
5P/ attempt
|
| Extra points for: |
|
| - Big complicated competitions ( for example: international standard) |
+0.5 P/Performance
|
| - Every protests dealt with |
+5 P
|
| - Award points for judges that competetes (very rewarding experience) |
3P/ performance
|
| - Award points for extra attendance at judge courses |
15P
|
|
|
Only judges with a certain amount of EP points can judge: national records, world records e t c
Rough suggestion
National Championships >200P (suggested guideline)
National records: >300P (suggested guideline)
World championships: >500P + assembly vote
World record attempts: >700P (selection by a commission of 3-5 people of non active judges).
Judge instructor: >1000P + NR/NC EP + individualWR EP + WC EP + assembly vote
Pre requisites for judges:
Compeeted in all disciplines,
Been safety freediver at pool and depth competition,
Certain age.
Awareness and decisiveness.
|